Pages: 9-25

Abstract

As it is known, issuance of the verdicts on the unity of the judicial procedure in line with the resolving of the controversies and conflicts in the courts’ verdicts and creating a uniform procedure in respect to the issues proposed in the justice department is one of the main and fundamental duties of the country’s Supreme Court; thus, the present study aims at criticizing the safeguarding of judicial procedure’s unity with an emphasis on the position of the country’s Supreme Court. To achieve this goal, efforts are initially made parallel to the recognition of the country’s Supreme Court and gaining insight about its most important duties as well as its structure. The present study has been conducted based on a descriptive-analytical method and the data has been collected through library research. And the information collection tool is note-taking. The information collected through note-taking and library research were analyzed based on descriptive-analytical method as the common method in legal studies. The legal position of the country’s Supreme Court in the area of safeguarding the unity of judicial procedure regarding the issued judicial verdicts and studying the discussions in need of the issuance of the judicial procedure unity order is intended to be clarified herein. Following presentation of the basic concepts, the author has dealt with these principles. The results obtained from doing research in this area are reflective of the idea that the clarification of some weak points of the judicial procedure unity verdicts makes it necessary to issue verdicts of judicial procedure unity and that the country’s Supreme Court, as the influential institution in the area of safeguarding judicial procedure unity, has been found performing successfully based on the law.